Socialist Outlook

Socialist Viewpoint, International, Socialist Outlook and their supplements, 1984–2002

Rail safety

Socialist Outlook no. 40, December 2000 · 251 words

This headline was read from the scan and is probably incomplete — a short title here is usually a fragment of display type. The text of the article is unaffected.

Railtrack boss Gerald Corbett seeks a safe way to travel by rail before being shunted into the sidings. (Right) Prescott: with two Fag, why should he worry? France, Germany and Great Britain. Between the summits there would be consultation on important political positions. This mechanism would be thus incorporated into the Treaties. Thus, an enormous step would have been taken: a real political leadership would be created in tune with the EU's ambition of becoming a superpower without being a supranational state (as Blair and Chirac say - though Schroeder is more discreet on this subject). In this scenario (which Chirac tried to impose on the smaller countries at Biarritz), the centre of gravity would move towaras the Council of Ministers. The EU would head towards a confederation, abandoning the federalist perspective, which implies a continuous and maximum transfer of the prerogatives of the states towards the supranational level.

confederation is distinA guished, by definition, from a federation or a unitary State, by the narrow number of supranational prerogatives: currency, defence, law and order, questions of citizenship. Greater "strengthened cooperation" will open this possibility, creating a more advanced and more coherent centre of gravity, to which the other states would be tied in on the basis of a more limited commitment.

This is already the case for monetary (Britain, Denmark aren't part of it), for the Schengen treaty, and for the setting up of the "Eurocorps". One can imagine that some Eastern countries W1ll 1011 Outlook manufacturers (Ford, GM, BMW

← Meltdown on the railways · Why Leeds Left Alliance were right to exclude SWP →

Something wrong on this page?