Socialist Outlook

Socialist Viewpoint, International, Socialist Outlook and their supplements, 1984–2002

Ireland: talking back to...

· Socialist Outlook no. 26, July–August 1992 · 529 words

Ireland

IN MARCH 1972 the Tory Government abolished the Northern Ireland Parliament at Stormont, ending 50 years of Unionist rule. wenty years later the declared aim of the current talks on the future of the North is a devolved parliament' in Beltast.

Stormont was abolished because it was incapable, even with 30,000 British soldiers, o! keeping the lid on an insurgent nationalist population which began by demanding civil rights and ended up challenging the existence of the Orange state itself.

Incapable

That the statelet was incapable of granting even modest demands such as one primarily due to the bigoted Unionism. It was built in at its roundaton in 1961, when part tion was imposed against the will of the majority of the Irish people. The mabuilt-in was drawn to enUnionist majority in the Six Counties and a great deal of effort went into balance remained. Behind the ensuring that the pulation Unionists and the bigots of the Orange Order stood the British When in 1969 the people of Derry threw back the combined assault of the RUC, the B Specials and the Orange Order, Harold Wilson's Labour The protestsagainst internment reached such a pitch in late 1971 that the Orange State shook to its foundatons - and the british response was to shoot unarmed demonstrators on Bloody Sunday.

Sunningdale

The Mayhew (formerly the Brooke talks are by no means the first attempt to restore Stormont. In 1974 the Sunningdale Agreement led to a 'Power Sharing Executive' which gave some influence to the Catholic SDLP. But the Paisleyite wing of Unionism was excluded and proceraca to wreck me agree ment by strike action in key inThe current talks, from which Sinn Fein are excluded, could make some headway because the British Government is stronger and the Unionists weaker than in 1974. They are the culmination of a process Which fran ith reemens Anglo Agreement. Meanwhile the Republicans are politically at their weakest for at least 10 years.

The crucial battleground is ngh in the carly 1901, he the economic crisis threatened to fuse with the national ques tion after the Hunger Strikes, the ruling class is now more strongly anti-republican and economically weaker.

It wants a deal, but doubts the ability of the Brits to deliver and so looks to the EC for a The end of the economic border in 1993 lends weight to their argument that the political border will become less important. But the price of influence in the North, however limited, is to drop Articles 2 & 3 of the Southern Constitution, which define the national territory as the whole island.

The British are opposed to in the British State. For that reason they are unlikely to nexonate a solution. But thes would settle for any agreement criticism and helps to marginalise the Republicans.

Meanwhile the economic ritish rule in the North continues. After 20 years of direct rule and much legislation, Catholics are still 2.5 times more likely to be unemployed than Protestants - virtually the same figure as during Stormont rule.

Starting the process - Thatcher in 1965 talks Socialist Outlook residential

← A Chilean i solution? · A euro-fighter in search of a target →

Something wrong on this page?