model of socialism? traditional stalinist system of OLIVER MACDONALD current Soviet leadership's drive THIs Is By far the best guide vet vigorously and, within the limits Abel Aganbegyan, The challenge: frankly. His book can form the Aganbegyan writes clearly, of what is a manifesto, very economic dimension of the basis for serious discussion available in English to the economes o/ perestroika: Hutchinson, £8.95. for perestroika.
Aganbegyan believes that with of the levels of provision in social workers in the Polish communist together with a large strengthing services, that kind of egalitarian 1970s led to ferment and revolt among the working class in the workers self-management and revelt can be avoided. Yet the party, a revolt that eventually big factories, especially tlic delegates to the June party greater political freedoms. results of the selection of crupted in the form of overtaking the west and reaching be a relative onc: the strength of the Sovict economy vis-a-vis the Furthermore, the measure of economy is in this debate must arvanced socialism in isolated, lead to an impasse, And as fie here it remains pitiably weak, world capitalist market, And autarkie development would and consequentiy subject to enormously strong material Bukharin-Stalin fantasy of As Trotsky argued, the how advanced the soviet performance by state enterprises, systems, commandist centralised face a choice between these two producers and consumers is not planning of exchanges between he describes as administrative; rong with the development of We should be quite frank in economic management, which acknowledging that when we co-operatives and individual methods of management, by which he means the use of and a call for economic" Novosibirsk school of economists. among socialists hore attempting mind that within what might be even wider in the field of tactics cconomic strategy and ultimate aim: and the variety of views is and tempo of economic reform. But for the last three years, the called the Gorbachev coalition to make sense of and evaluate views of Aganbogyan and his Ir is important to bear in conception of the desired have been the dominant ,there is not one single economic perestroika.
The answer to this crisis of the books to the workers, explain to them the scope of the crisis, the the reformers to genuinely take industrial workers have not yet swung into action in a decisive Soviet reform movement is for way to destroy the hold of the They haven't moved because die Soviet working class ato their contidence: to open the leadership on the big plants. Ligarhey wing of the party: they remain suspicious of Trotsky's argument in the 1920s such an isolated economy is, the also argued, the more advanced more acute its dilliculties would open public life and democratic would indeed have worked very economic policy of any sort can and market with the voluntary was precisely to combine plan much better. And no socialist commandist planning system planning has failed. With an abandon strategic planning- None of this mcans that accountability the Soviet ever gave the slightest indication administrative regimentation of any way superior to NEP. Those in principle in any way superior after 1921 that they would have Some on the lelt here, on the to the use of market indicators. connomic relations as being in followed Trotsky in 1929 over currently claiming that Stalin ignorant fools as far as Soviet: history is concerned, or liars. Neither Lenin nor Trotsky in the Soviet Union who aro economic policy are either supported Stalin's programme of Gorbachev or that Too much of the discussion on himself and his immediate circle European experience of degrees introduced, an iron logic of the market leads inevitably" to the conclusions of the monetarists. the lefi here over these issues either assumes that the most extreme marketisers /called Union) represent the real! once market indicators are influence spon Gorbachev "monetarists' in the Sovict The very extensive east
need for austerity, the way that the burraucracy, as Yeltsin has destruction of the privileges of democratic vote of work-place stalinist commandist planning trotskyists should argue for: a demanded, and then put the This is the answer which package of measures to the against the introduction of co-operatives and market forward; not a defence of austerity will involve the socialiat, democratic way SOCIALIST OUTLOOK no B great costs attached to it, so does forms of ownership alongside the marketisation are not adequately just as the commandist plan has threats of poverty for sections of the Soviet economy, there is no viable alternative to a policy of In the current deep crisis of They include the inevitable this kind. On the other hand, growth of social inequalities, development of co-operative state and individual-family the market. These costs of faced by Aganbegyan. unlike in the 1920s, the USSR has a highly advanced cconomy, has The fact is that the commandist system has for decades operated adoption of market indicators is contradictions of backwardness that made NEP necessary in the a retreat from advanced, more other hand, argue that today, This is simply not the case. not only alongside, but to a considerable extent through a very large market a parallel 1920s and consequently an freed itself from the socialist positions. introduction of market indicators to increased social differentiation of marketisation shows that this economic allocations and leads within the working population network realities) egalitarianism Aganhegyan's platform is a decentralises decisions about formal-legal (as opposed to 34 wholesale assault upon the parallel-market. and corrupt is far from being the case. What is true is that the of centralised command by comparison with the planning 34
REVIEWS play to go Well it's a •TuL CELiC STORY a new